header-logo header-logo

23 January 2021
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Pandemic creates hardship at the Bar

Barristers are at ‘breaking point’ due to court closures during COVID-19, with many facing financial and psychological hardship, a Bar Council survey has found

While there are some signs of recovery―hours and fee income are higher than in summer 2020―many barristers are taking on large amounts of debt to stay afloat, the research found. More than three-fifths of self-employed barristers have taken on personal debt or used savings, with 27% of the criminal Bar taking on more than £20,000 debt.

Those from ethnic minority backgrounds were disproportionately affected―nearly half (48%) are currently experiencing financial hardship and 72% said they have at some point during the pandemic.

Alarmingly, some 84% of respondents had safety concerns regarding cleanliness and ventilation in courts, and said safety measures were not consistently enforced.

Nearly one-fifth (18%) said they want to leave the profession.

Chair of the Bar Council, Derek Sweeting QC said: ‘The findings of this survey send a stark message: that many barristers have reached breaking point.

‘The state of the publicly funded Bar is particularly worrying, with barristers forced to take on significant amounts of debt to prop up an underfunded justice system and working to the point of exhaustion to keep afloat. For years, the justice system has been underfunded, but coronavirus has exposed how fragile it is in many areas which directly affect ordinary members of the public.’

Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll