header-logo header-logo

03 September 2009 / David Oldham
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Paperless cases

David Oldham observes how IT is increasingly used in court

In a previous article (NLJ 1 May 2009), I commented on the failure of government to provide funding for the sort of technological assistance that Lord Woolf envisaged 10 years ago for courts and judges. In this article, I consider what other sorts of IT are available which might help judges and lawyers to conduct litigation more efficiently.

I admit immediately that I am not a “techie”, and so I do not pretend to understand the technical aspects of a lot of IT. What interests me is how user-friendly it is, how easily it could be introduced, and whether realistically it might be affordable. Will it help me in my day-to-day work, and will it make the system more efficient, and reduce delay and cost?
 

In many ways, the county courts in England and Wales still operate much as they did 100 years ago. The system remains paper-based, with paper files for every case. In my previous article, I mentioned that work on an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll