header-logo header-logo

26 November 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Opinion , Immigration & asylum , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Pardon me?

32882
Can President Trump lawfully pardon himself? Michael Zander on a very live question

Joe Biden is to be sworn in as President of the United States on Wednesday 20 January 2021. On that day, whether he graces the occasion with his presence or not, Mr Trump will become liable to criminal prosecution like any other citizen. Could he pardon himself before that fell day? The question sounds like an Alice-in-Wonderland absurdity.

The US Constitution states that the president ‘shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment’. (Art 2, s 2, cl 1). The phrase ‘offences against the United States’ means federal crimes. A pardon could therefore not affect the criminal tax fraud cases currently under investigation by Manhattan District Attorney, Cyrus Vance or civil fraud cases against President Trump currently under investigation by New York Attorney General, Letitia James.

Since no previous US president has exercised the power, the question whether a self-pardon is lawful has never yet been considered by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll