header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Partners win right to appeal taxable partnership profits

Recession prompts boost in enforced retirements

Partners are increasingly being forced to “retire” as a result of the economic downturn, leading to a rise in partnership tax disputes.

Anecdotal evidence suggests enforced “retirements” are on the rise, are often acrimonious and are frequently accompanied by arguments over the amount of taxable profits which should be allocated to the partner, according to accountants Smith & Williamson.

Departing partners can be faced with a substantial tax bill with which he or she disagrees.

The situation is made worse by the fact there is often “an inequality of arms between the warring parties”, Smith & Williamson says, since the retired partner may not be able to afford legal representation and may no longer have access to the firm’s detailed records. Moreover, HMRC will only liaise with the partner nominated by the firm to compute assessable profits, and has hitherto treated this figure as “sacrosanct”.

However, two recent tax tribunal decisions suggest HMRC’s stance is incorrect, and have found in favour of the individual.

In Morgan

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll