header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Partners win right to appeal taxable partnership profits

Recession prompts boost in enforced retirements

Partners are increasingly being forced to “retire” as a result of the economic downturn, leading to a rise in partnership tax disputes.

Anecdotal evidence suggests enforced “retirements” are on the rise, are often acrimonious and are frequently accompanied by arguments over the amount of taxable profits which should be allocated to the partner, according to accountants Smith & Williamson.

Departing partners can be faced with a substantial tax bill with which he or she disagrees.

The situation is made worse by the fact there is often “an inequality of arms between the warring parties”, Smith & Williamson says, since the retired partner may not be able to afford legal representation and may no longer have access to the firm’s detailed records. Moreover, HMRC will only liaise with the partner nominated by the firm to compute assessable profits, and has hitherto treated this figure as “sacrosanct”.

However, two recent tax tribunal decisions suggest HMRC’s stance is incorrect, and have found in favour of the individual.

In Morgan

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll