header-logo header-logo

13 November 2014
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Patent

HTC Corporation v Gemalto S.A. [2014] EWCA Civ 1335, [2014] All ER (D) 274 (Oct)

The claimants brought bringing pre-emptive action for revocation of the defendant’s patents relating to computers and computer programming. In earlier proceedings, the court had found, among other things, that one of the defendant’s patent had not been infringed by the claimant’s devices. The defendant appealed. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the appeal, held that the judge had correctly held that, on the true construction of one of the claims of the patent, there had been no infringement by any of the defendant’s devices.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll