header-logo header-logo

06 October 2016
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Patent change

A raft of changes to the Patents Rules 2007 came into force on 1 October, including a simplified process for granting patents.

From that date, the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) will issue a new notification of intention to grant, giving applicants one or two months’ notice. No further action on their part will be required.

From 1 October, applicants will simply have 12 months from termination of their application to request reinstatement.

A two-month extension to the period for providing an address for service will be allowed, as long as applicants file the appropriate request form and pay a fee. Previously, no extension was available.

Black and white photographs and shading in drawings will be permitted in patent applications.

The IPO has also provided clarification on when applicants can amend an international patent application that is entering the UK national phase. It will continue to be possible to amend applications during this stage.

Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll