header-logo header-logo

Patent law: the grace is on?

10 June 2022
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Features , Patents
printer mail-detail
84227
Where does UK patent law stand on grace periods for disclosure? Phillip Johnson assesses the changing landscape
  • Under UK patent law, grace periods are very limited, meaning that any disclosure of an invention made before the priority date will undermine the novelty of the patent.
  • The UK is trying to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, but to do so it will need to resolve a conflict it creates with its membership of the European Patent Convention.

Whether to give inventors a general grace period so that they can safely disclose the invention and not lose the right to a patent has been a topic of international interest for decades. The issue can be stated by the following scenario: a person turns up at a patent attorney’s office and says: ‘I have just invented the best thing ever. I described it to all my friends in the pub last night and they all agree I should patent it.’ The patent attorney interrupts to say it is not patentable. Now

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll