header-logo header-logo

Patent law: the grace is on?

10 June 2022
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Features , Patents
printer mail-detail
84227
Where does UK patent law stand on grace periods for disclosure? Phillip Johnson assesses the changing landscape
  • Under UK patent law, grace periods are very limited, meaning that any disclosure of an invention made before the priority date will undermine the novelty of the patent.
  • The UK is trying to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, but to do so it will need to resolve a conflict it creates with its membership of the European Patent Convention.

Whether to give inventors a general grace period so that they can safely disclose the invention and not lose the right to a patent has been a topic of international interest for decades. The issue can be stated by the following scenario: a person turns up at a patent attorney’s office and says: ‘I have just invented the best thing ever. I described it to all my friends in the pub last night and they all agree I should patent it.’ The patent attorney interrupts to say it is not patentable. Now

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll