header-logo header-logo

30 August 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Patents (Amendment) Rules 2011 (SI 2011/2052)

Amend the Patents Rules 2007, SI 2007/3291 to change the various prescribed time periods...

Commencement date

1 October 2011

Legislation Affected

SI 2007/3291 amended

Summary

Amend the Patents Rules 2007, SI 2007/3291 to change the various prescribed time periods by substituting a reference to “beginning immediately after” for the references to “beginning with” so that when computing a period of time by reference to a relevant event, the date on which the relevant event occurred is not included.

In practical terms, this means where a rule requires a document to be filed within one month of an event and the relevant event occurs on 1 March, then the document must be filed on or before 1 April. This will restore the drafting in this respect to that which appeared in the Patents Rules prior to their modernisation and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll