header-logo header-logo

Patents progress

26 May 2011
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Copyright review calls for “unified European patent system”

A “digital copyright exchange” or online shop where copyrights could be bought and sold would help businesses cope with the complex laws of intellectual property, according to the Hargreaves review.

The review, Digital Opportunity, led by Cardiff University’s Professor Ian Hargreaves, calls for the creation of a unified European patent system, and for patent fees to be reformed so there is no longer an incentive to create “thickets” or multiple layers of patents.

It was set up six months ago following Google’s announcement that it could not have started its business in the UK because of the copyright laws.
However, Hargreaves rejects the possibility of introducing a US-style “fair use” policy, which would be illegal under EU law.

Mark Owen, head of  IP at Harbottle & Lewis, said: “When David Cameron set the review up he made much of the benefits he saw from introducing a fair use right, and cynics detected in this an attempt to appear pro-innovation without the government having to do much, in particular not spend money as through tax breaks.

“As plenty of commentators said at the time, EU law would not allow this. Hargreaves has echoed that and dismissed the possibility of a fair use law. Instead he has listened and listed a large number of less radical changes government must consider.”

Owen said the review was “careful and balanced”.

“Perhaps the most important idea is that the UK should introduce the same exceptions to copyright as the rest of the EU. Bringing our law more into line internationally is worth considering. From the perspective of important trading partners such as the US and the EU, much about UK copyright law seems odd and out of step, and this costs us.”

Simon Mounteney, partner at Marks & Clerk, said implementation of many of the recommendations might “prove extremely challenging”.
 

Issue: 7467 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll