header-logo header-logo

Paying for the Ombudsman

10 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers lose right to free complaint cases

Lawyers will lose their right to two free client complaints cases per year from April, raising an extra £1.6m in fees for the Legal Ombudsman.

Annual fee income should then amount to about £1.8m, which means the levy against firms will fall slightly from £16.8m to £15.1m, according to the Ombudsman’s budget plan for 2013/14.

Currently, lawyers are allowed two free cases per year. The Ombudsman also has discretion to waive fees in cases where it is satisfied the customer service was adequate and the remedy offered was reasonable. Otherwise, a £400 fee per case is chargeable.

The rule was introduced to address concerns that small firms and those operating in contentious areas of law would generate more complaints and therefore be unfairly affected by case fees. In practice, however, only 400 firms exceeded their free allowance—fewer than expected—while the Ombudsman waived fees in more than a third of cases—more than expected.

In November, the Ombudsman argued in a consultation document that the waiver option gave small firms engaged in risky work sufficient protection. The proposal received support from firms and legal bodies.

The Ombudsman anticipates it “may receive a very significant level of demand” when it begins accepting claims management company (CMC) complaints this year, and cites the example of the Financial Ombudsman Service, which receives 1,500 claims per day about payment protection insurance, half of which involve CMCs. However, it says this is impossible to predict.

Writing in the report, Chief Ombudsman Adam Sampson said: “Although we have made a good start to our work, we can still improve on the speed, cost and quality of our handling of complaints.”

Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll