header-logo header-logo

Paying for the Ombudsman

10 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers lose right to free complaint cases

Lawyers will lose their right to two free client complaints cases per year from April, raising an extra £1.6m in fees for the Legal Ombudsman.

Annual fee income should then amount to about £1.8m, which means the levy against firms will fall slightly from £16.8m to £15.1m, according to the Ombudsman’s budget plan for 2013/14.

Currently, lawyers are allowed two free cases per year. The Ombudsman also has discretion to waive fees in cases where it is satisfied the customer service was adequate and the remedy offered was reasonable. Otherwise, a £400 fee per case is chargeable.

The rule was introduced to address concerns that small firms and those operating in contentious areas of law would generate more complaints and therefore be unfairly affected by case fees. In practice, however, only 400 firms exceeded their free allowance—fewer than expected—while the Ombudsman waived fees in more than a third of cases—more than expected.

In November, the Ombudsman argued in a consultation document that the waiver option gave small firms engaged in risky work sufficient protection. The proposal received support from firms and legal bodies.

The Ombudsman anticipates it “may receive a very significant level of demand” when it begins accepting claims management company (CMC) complaints this year, and cites the example of the Financial Ombudsman Service, which receives 1,500 claims per day about payment protection insurance, half of which involve CMCs. However, it says this is impossible to predict.

Writing in the report, Chief Ombudsman Adam Sampson said: “Although we have made a good start to our work, we can still improve on the speed, cost and quality of our handling of complaints.”

Issue: 7543 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll