header-logo header-logo

21 February 2017
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Peers discuss Brexit

The government should not assume that the Brexit Bill meets all the requirements of the recent Supreme Court ruling on Art 50, former Supreme Court Justice Lord Hope has warned.

Lord Hope was speaking during the House of Lords’ debate on the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill this week. The Bill passed through the Commons unamended, but may meet stronger opposition in the Lords.The Supreme Court held last month that Parliamentary approval, rather than the prime minister’s use of the Royal Prerogative, was required to trigger Article 50, the formal notification process for leaving the EU.

A record 187 Peers are scheduled to speak during the debate, on the Bill. Unusually, the launch of the debate was attended by Prime Minister Theresa May, the first PM in decades to attend a Lords debate.

Baroness Evans, the Conservative leader in the Lords, who began the debate, said: “This Bill is not the place to try and shape the terms of our exit, restrict the government’s hand before it enters into complex negotiations or attempt to re-run the referendum.”

Baroness Smith, the Labour leader in the Lords, said her party would not “block, wreck or sabotage” the Bill, before adding “neither shall we provide the government with a blank cheque”.

Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll