header-logo header-logo

Peers discuss Brexit

21 February 2017
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The government should not assume that the Brexit Bill meets all the requirements of the recent Supreme Court ruling on Art 50, former Supreme Court Justice Lord Hope has warned.

Lord Hope was speaking during the House of Lords’ debate on the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill this week. The Bill passed through the Commons unamended, but may meet stronger opposition in the Lords.The Supreme Court held last month that Parliamentary approval, rather than the prime minister’s use of the Royal Prerogative, was required to trigger Article 50, the formal notification process for leaving the EU.

A record 187 Peers are scheduled to speak during the debate, on the Bill. Unusually, the launch of the debate was attended by Prime Minister Theresa May, the first PM in decades to attend a Lords debate.

Baroness Evans, the Conservative leader in the Lords, who began the debate, said: “This Bill is not the place to try and shape the terms of our exit, restrict the government’s hand before it enters into complex negotiations or attempt to re-run the referendum.”

Baroness Smith, the Labour leader in the Lords, said her party would not “block, wreck or sabotage” the Bill, before adding “neither shall we provide the government with a blank cheque”.

Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll