header-logo header-logo

12 May 2016
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Peers say no to UK Bill of Rights

Peers have called on the government to think again on its proposal to introduce a UK Bill of Rights. A report by the House of Lords’ EU Justice Committee, published this week, says the government’s proposals will not significantly depart from the existing Human Rights Act and are likely to affirm in a Bill of Rights all the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. The case for a Bill of Rights is therefore unclear, Peers say, but the exercise could damage the UK’s standing in the EU and Council of Europe and risk constitutional upheaval with devolved nations. Committee Chairman, Baroness Kennedy said: “We were not convinced that a Bill of Rights was necessary.”

Issue: 7698 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll