header-logo header-logo

02 March 2017
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Peers support EU nationals

The House of Lords has voted 358 to 256 to secure the right for EU nationals to stay in the UK post-Brexit.

Seven Conservatives joined Peers from other parties to vote for the amendment to the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill (Brexit Bill).

Some Conservative MPs, who will have their say on the Bill when it returns to the House of Commons in two weeks’ time, had argued that giving guarantees to EU citizens in Britain would reduce the UK’s bargaining power in negotiations over the status of its own nationals living in Member States.

The amendment means the Bill will now go through “Parliamentary ping pong”, moving between the two Houses. Labour MPs have said they will support the amendment, but, while there is some support, Conservative MPs may be harder to convince.

The Bill has been passing through the committee stage of the Lords. Earlier this week, Lord Hain failed to persuade a majority of Peers to back an amendment committing the government to negotiating Brexit on the basis the UK would remain in the single market.

Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll