header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015 / Anthony Nixon
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The pen is mightier…

nlj_7665_nixon

Anthony Nixon provides retrospective will-writing advice to some well-known scribes

“I give unto my wife my second-best bed with the furniture” (Will of William Shakespeare, died 23 April 1616)

William Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway were married for 33 years and had three children. Yet this is the only mention of Hathaway in the playwright’s will, which gave most of his property to Susanna, one of two surviving children.

Commentators differ as to whether Hathaway, as widow, was, independently of the will, entitled to a “dower” of one-third of her husband’s estate. But if Shakespeare were to come to me today, asking me to draft a will on these lines, I would strongly recommend some changes.

Reasonable financial provision

In the first place, Hathaway could almost certainly claim, under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, that Shakespeare’s will failed to make “reasonable financial provision” for her and ask a court to award her more. The other child, Judith, might also get involved, because Susanna was so much better provided for. Hathaway, Susanna and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll