header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015 / Anthony Nixon
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The pen is mightier…

nlj_7665_nixon

Anthony Nixon provides retrospective will-writing advice to some well-known scribes

“I give unto my wife my second-best bed with the furniture” (Will of William Shakespeare, died 23 April 1616)

William Shakespeare and Anne Hathaway were married for 33 years and had three children. Yet this is the only mention of Hathaway in the playwright’s will, which gave most of his property to Susanna, one of two surviving children.

Commentators differ as to whether Hathaway, as widow, was, independently of the will, entitled to a “dower” of one-third of her husband’s estate. But if Shakespeare were to come to me today, asking me to draft a will on these lines, I would strongly recommend some changes.

Reasonable financial provision

In the first place, Hathaway could almost certainly claim, under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, that Shakespeare’s will failed to make “reasonable financial provision” for her and ask a court to award her more. The other child, Judith, might also get involved, because Susanna was so much better provided for. Hathaway, Susanna and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll