header-logo header-logo

11 March 2016
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Pension

Safeway Ltd v Newton and another [2016] EWHC 377 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 17 (Mar)

The Chancery Division ruled on when a change in the normal pension age for members of the pension scheme for employees of the claimant company, Safeway Ltd, took effect. It held that a 2 May 1996 deed had not been effective to retrospectively introduce a common normal pension age for the future (65 for men and women) for the period from 1 December 1991. The result was that both men and women were entitled to benefits in respect of the period from 1 December 1991 to 2 May 1996 based on an NPA of 60.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Eversheds Sutherland—Claire Petheram

Eversheds Sutherland—Claire Petheram

Eversheds Sutherland strengthens top-ranked pensions practice with appointment of former global head of pensions

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

Law firm strengthens private client team to support continued growth

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires expands offering with appointment of tax partner Andrew Cromb

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners
back-to-top-scroll