header-logo header-logo

Perfecting the process

06 July 2012 / Adrian White
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Getting e-disclosure right is essential as the courts take a tougher approach to document review, says Adrian White

How to approach an e-disclosure exercise is a growing dilemma for law firms and their clients as the volume and diversity of documents continues to expand. Allocating too few resources to the process could cause key documents to be overlooked, denying you and the other side key evidence. Overengineering the process could generate too much data, raising costs and risking the ire of the courts.

As e-disclosure has become a regular feature of litigation and regulatory processes, the consequences of getting it wrong are no longer hypothetical. This fact was amply demonstrated earlier this year in the case of West African Gas Pipeline Company Ltd v Willbros Global Holdings Inc [2012] EWHC 396 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 60 (May) in which a significant costs order was made against the West African Gas Pipeline Company for failing to provide adequate disclosure, in part due to mistakes made during its search for and review of its own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll