header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012 / Adrian White
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Perfecting the process

Getting e-disclosure right is essential as the courts take a tougher approach to document review, says Adrian White

How to approach an e-disclosure exercise is a growing dilemma for law firms and their clients as the volume and diversity of documents continues to expand. Allocating too few resources to the process could cause key documents to be overlooked, denying you and the other side key evidence. Overengineering the process could generate too much data, raising costs and risking the ire of the courts.

As e-disclosure has become a regular feature of litigation and regulatory processes, the consequences of getting it wrong are no longer hypothetical. This fact was amply demonstrated earlier this year in the case of West African Gas Pipeline Company Ltd v Willbros Global Holdings Inc [2012] EWHC 396 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 60 (May) in which a significant costs order was made against the West African Gas Pipeline Company for failing to provide adequate disclosure, in part due to mistakes made during its search for and review of its own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll