header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012 / Adrian White
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Perfecting the process

Getting e-disclosure right is essential as the courts take a tougher approach to document review, says Adrian White

How to approach an e-disclosure exercise is a growing dilemma for law firms and their clients as the volume and diversity of documents continues to expand. Allocating too few resources to the process could cause key documents to be overlooked, denying you and the other side key evidence. Overengineering the process could generate too much data, raising costs and risking the ire of the courts.

As e-disclosure has become a regular feature of litigation and regulatory processes, the consequences of getting it wrong are no longer hypothetical. This fact was amply demonstrated earlier this year in the case of West African Gas Pipeline Company Ltd v Willbros Global Holdings Inc [2012] EWHC 396 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 60 (May) in which a significant costs order was made against the West African Gas Pipeline Company for failing to provide adequate disclosure, in part due to mistakes made during its search for and review of its own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll