header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Perilous times

Is the UK/EU approach to corporation regulation too heavy-handed? Khawar Qureshi QC reports

To understand the present approach to corporate regulation in the UK, it is necessary to appreciate the philosophical dilemma presented by the fact that a company is a creature of law, and to hold it liable under criminal law invariably involves blaming an individual or individuals whose conduct is (artificially) imputed to the company.

Hence, recent trends towards placing greater responsibility upon companies by means of legal regulation are designed to “persuade” them to develop practices and due diligence-based systems, which are aimed at making wrong-doing less likely. It is for that reason that companies may, for example, face big penalties vis-à-vis cartel behaviour or corporate manslaughter charges when it is apparent that systems were not in place, were deliberately overridden, or failed to prevent wrongdoing.

Different societies use their own methods to try to ensure that companies operate within the ambit of the rule of law. However, the use of statute to “put down markers”, combined with the activities of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll