header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Perilous times

Is the UK/EU approach to corporation regulation too heavy-handed? Khawar Qureshi QC reports

To understand the present approach to corporate regulation in the UK, it is necessary to appreciate the philosophical dilemma presented by the fact that a company is a creature of law, and to hold it liable under criminal law invariably involves blaming an individual or individuals whose conduct is (artificially) imputed to the company.

Hence, recent trends towards placing greater responsibility upon companies by means of legal regulation are designed to “persuade” them to develop practices and due diligence-based systems, which are aimed at making wrong-doing less likely. It is for that reason that companies may, for example, face big penalties vis-à-vis cartel behaviour or corporate manslaughter charges when it is apparent that systems were not in place, were deliberately overridden, or failed to prevent wrongdoing.

Different societies use their own methods to try to ensure that companies operate within the ambit of the rule of law. However, the use of statute to “put down markers”, combined with the activities of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll