header-logo header-logo

Personal concepts

27 September 2007 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7290 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

The EU is promoting a broader definition of personal data, says Helen Hart

The EC Article 29 Data Protection Working Party has issued its opinion regarding the definition of personal data (Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data). UK organisations could find their statutory obligations more onerous if UK courts apply the working party’s wide interpretation instead of the controversial restrictive interpretation of the concept of personal data in Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746, [2003] All ER (D) 124 (Dec). The Information Commissioner’s Office has issued a technical guidance note at www.ico.gov.uk which largely follows the opinion.
Art 2(a) of the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (the Directive) defines personal data as “any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person”. The opinion analyses the four main elements set out in the definition.

“Any information”

Personal data includes any statements about a person. It covers objective information, such as the presence of a certain substance in one’s blood, and subjective information, opinions or assessments. It does not have to be true

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll