header-logo header-logo

27 September 2007 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7290 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Personal concepts

The EU is promoting a broader definition of personal data, says Helen Hart

The EC Article 29 Data Protection Working Party has issued its opinion regarding the definition of personal data (Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data). UK organisations could find their statutory obligations more onerous if UK courts apply the working party’s wide interpretation instead of the controversial restrictive interpretation of the concept of personal data in Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746, [2003] All ER (D) 124 (Dec). The Information Commissioner’s Office has issued a technical guidance note at www.ico.gov.uk which largely follows the opinion.
Art 2(a) of the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (the Directive) defines personal data as “any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person”. The opinion analyses the four main elements set out in the definition.

“Any information”

Personal data includes any statements about a person. It covers objective information, such as the presence of a certain substance in one’s blood, and subjective information, opinions or assessments. It does not have to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll