header-logo header-logo

Personal concepts

27 September 2007 / Helen Hart
Issue: 7290 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

The EU is promoting a broader definition of personal data, says Helen Hart

The EC Article 29 Data Protection Working Party has issued its opinion regarding the definition of personal data (Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data). UK organisations could find their statutory obligations more onerous if UK courts apply the working party’s wide interpretation instead of the controversial restrictive interpretation of the concept of personal data in Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746, [2003] All ER (D) 124 (Dec). The Information Commissioner’s Office has issued a technical guidance note at www.ico.gov.uk which largely follows the opinion.
Art 2(a) of the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (the Directive) defines personal data as “any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person”. The opinion analyses the four main elements set out in the definition.

“Any information”

Personal data includes any statements about a person. It covers objective information, such as the presence of a certain substance in one’s blood, and subjective information, opinions or assessments. It does not have to be true

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll