header-logo header-logo

23 May 2014
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Personal data—Protection of individuals—Internet search engines

Google Spain SL and another v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and another Case C-131/12

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), 13 May 2014, Judges Skouris (President), Lenaerts (Vice-President), Ilešic (Rapporteur), Bay Larsen, von Danwitz, Safjan (Presidents of Chambers), Malenovský, Levits, Ó Caoimh, Arabadjiev, Berger, Prechal and Jarašiunas.

The Grand Chamber has made a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of Art 2(b) and (d), Art 4(1)(a) and (c), Art 12(b) and Art 14(a) of Directive 95/46/EC (on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data) and of Art 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Council Directive 95/46 had the object of protecting the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, and in particular their right to privacy with respect to the processing of personal data, and of removing obstacles to the free flow of such data. 

The underlying proceedings were between the search engine company Google on the one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll