header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Martin Porter KC
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Personal injury: Blame the victim

Martin Porter QC comments on a ruling which will send shivers down the spines of cyclists

On a summer's evening in 2005, Robert Smith, cycled the short distance from his home to another house in Brightlingsea, Essex. Just before he reached his destination, a motorcycle ridden by Michael Finch collided with the bicycle and as a consequence Smith sustained a serious traumatic brain injury.

Judgment in Smith v Finch [2009] EWCH 53 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 158 (Jan) was handed down by Mr Justice Griffith Williams on 22 January 2009. He accepted the claimant's case that the accident happened while the claimant was close to the centre of the road preparing to turn right into the driveway of his destination and when the motorcyclist, travelling at excessive speed in the same direction, tried to overtake him on the offside. He rejected the defendant's case that the claimant had come out of a side road to the motorcyclist's left straight into his path. So far, so commonplace a resolution of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll