header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Martin Porter KC
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Personal injury: Blame the victim

Martin Porter QC comments on a ruling which will send shivers down the spines of cyclists

On a summer's evening in 2005, Robert Smith, cycled the short distance from his home to another house in Brightlingsea, Essex. Just before he reached his destination, a motorcycle ridden by Michael Finch collided with the bicycle and as a consequence Smith sustained a serious traumatic brain injury.

Judgment in Smith v Finch [2009] EWCH 53 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 158 (Jan) was handed down by Mr Justice Griffith Williams on 22 January 2009. He accepted the claimant's case that the accident happened while the claimant was close to the centre of the road preparing to turn right into the driveway of his destination and when the motorcyclist, travelling at excessive speed in the same direction, tried to overtake him on the offside. He rejected the defendant's case that the claimant had come out of a side road to the motorcyclist's left straight into his path. So far, so commonplace a resolution of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll