header-logo header-logo

13 September 2023
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Personal injury discount rate: single, dual or multiple?

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said that it will not be recommending a policy position or deciding on whether a dual/multiple PIDR should be introduced at this time.

The discount rate is used to calculate long-term compensation for serious injury victims. The MoJ this week published its response to a call for evidence on the rate, and will feed its summary of views received to an independent expert panel advising the Lord Chancellor on next steps. The next review of the discount rate must take place by July 2024.

Christopher Malla, partner at Kennedys, said that if the panel recommended change, his firm’s ‘preference would be for a dual rather than a more complex multiple rate.

‘Practitioners could apply it themselves, rather than having to instruct actuaries or economists as is the case in some of the other jurisdictions where we operate, namely Ireland and Hong Kong. It must be a simple system to allow practitioners to calculate to avoid an increase in legal costs.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll