header-logo header-logo

Personal injury woes & highs

19 September 2018
Issue: 7809 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Quality of service in personal injury market ‘crucial’

Mystery shoppers have uncovered a series of poor responses from personal injury (PI) lawyers, including inappropriate replies, slowness to follow-up and a lack of enthusiasm.

Posing as potential clients, mystery shoppers hired by legal marketing collective First4Lawyers contacted 50 law firms both by telephone and through their website, ranking each firm’s efforts to gain their business.

One mystery shopper revealed: ‘I said it was an accident at work, to which she replied, “lovely, thank you,” with a level of enthusiasm that was entirely inappropriate.’ Another asked for the receptionist’s name three times and was told it didn’t matter because ‘she was going to lunch’.

Where the shopper left a message and the firm had to call back, an astonishing 23% of firms did not do so for more than two days, or at all. On the other hand, 35% of firms had called back within 15 minutes.

The shoppers also reported the lack of a sense that the firm really wanted the work, with only 52% of the firms attempting to add value or ‘go further’ for the potential client, and firms often failing to explain their value to the client and usually not offering to send further information or make a follow-up call.

Nevertheless, four-fifths of firms were ‘warm and engaging’ overall, according to the shoppers. Some 84% of web enquiries led to a telephone conversation. When asked to rate the likelihood of recommending the firm to others on a scale of 1-10, 62% of firms received an 8, 9 or perfect 10.

Qamar Anwar, First4Lawyers’s managing director, said: ‘Low-value PI is an unusual market in that there is no real price competition.

‘So, the quality of service, from the moment the phone rings or the email pings, is crucial. This is especially important given legal regulators’ efforts to encourage consumers to shop around for a lawyer.’

Issue: 7809 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll