header-logo header-logo

Persons unknown

20 November 2014 / Tim Lawson-Cruttenden
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Tim Lawson-Cruttenden examines the evolution of claims against unnamed defendants in non-land law cases

On 8 October Mrs Justice McGowan ordered injunctive relief in Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd v (1) Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty and (2) Persons Unknown [2014] EWHC 3429 (QB).

The injunction is intended to protect the employees of Novartis, an international pharmaceutical company, against harassment by animal rights activists. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty, whose membership is unknown and deliberately anonymous, were joined into the action using the representative mechanism under CPR 19.6. This mechanism enables unincorporated associations to be sued through a named individual. However, the making of orders against “persons unknown” was thought to be sufficiently innovative for the High Court to seek a review of this developing area of the law which has thus far had little supervision from the Court of Appeal.

The purpose of this article, in relation to the joining in as defendants of persons unknown, is to consider:

  1. the historical law up to 2003;
  2. recent developments since 2003;
  3. the effect of the Novartis decision; and
  4. the impact
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll