header-logo header-logo

26 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Perspectives on employment claims

Acas has published an in-depth study of conciliation at employment tribunals.

Since April 2014, it has been mandatory for employees wishing to bring a claim to first contact Acas for “early conciliation”. Acas also offers conciliation services at a later stage where the claim proceeds.

The report, Evaluation of ACAS conciliation in employment tribunal applications 2016, found that more than a quarter of employment tribunal claimants who abandon their claims do so because they think they won’t win or it will be a waste of time. One in five found the fees were too high, and 17% found the process too stressful.

For employers, the figures were much the same—28% didn’t think they would win or it would be a waste of time, 22% thought they didn’t have a case or their case would be thrown out by the judge, and 14% found the tribunal fees off-putting.

Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll