header-logo header-logo

23 August 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Phenomenal times for civil litigation

2016 has been a “phenomenal year” for civil litigation, Professor Dominic Regan writes in NLJ.

The Supreme Court held that the tort of malicious prosecution included the prosecution of civil proceedings (Willers v Joyce), and extended the scope of vicarious liability to include an unprovoked attack by an employee against a customer (Mohamud v Morrisons).

There was further development of the Jackson civil litigation reforms, including in Oak Cash and Carry v British Gas Trading where relief from sanction was refused to a defendant for failing to file a pre-trial checklist until two days after deadline.

In addition, Prof Regan writes, the “demon concept of proportionality reared its ugly head” in two costs cases, resulting in bills being reduced by a “staggering” 50% and 58%.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll