header-logo header-logo

19 February 2020 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7875 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

PI reforms: on the road to nowhere?

16208
Dominic Regan urges the government to think twice before introducing a raft of personal injury reforms

The government is intent upon increasing the personal injury small claims limit. That is understandable insofar as it has stood at £1,000 since 1991. It will double soon but for most road traffic accidents it will increase fivefold.

At the same time, using powers under the Civil Liability Act 2018, the Lord Chancellor, whoever that might happen to be in the relevant week, will impose a tariff for whiplash injuries affecting the neck, back or shoulder. Quantum will be devalued and common cases will attract awards of a few hundred pounds. Even those cases where symptoms continue for, say, 18 months will be small claims. Consequently, legal costs, which are already capped at modest levels, will disappear.

Absent legal advice, claimants will inevitably become their own legal representatives. The theory is that a user-friendly claims portal administered by the Motor Insurers Bureau will enable a claimant to bring a claim. For a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll