header-logo header-logo

24 June 2022
Issue: 7984 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Profession
printer mail-detail

PII changes for conveyancers

Property and probate firms must submit at least one application for professional indemnity insurance (PII) two months ahead of the renewal deadline, under plans approved by the Legal Services Board (LSB)

The rule change applies from 2023 to all firms regulated by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC). Insurers receiving applications will be required to respond no less than one month before the 1 June deadline, in order to reduce the risks involved when firms and insurers take renewal to the wire (30 June cut-off).

The rule change, agreed by the CLC, aims to give practices enough time to seek alternative cover if needed.

The CLC will also require an automatic 90-day extension of cover in the event a practice is unable to renew, with the last insurer paid a pro rata premium based on the most recent policy. During the extended cover period, the practice will be barred from taking on new work. If the firm succeeds in finding a new insurer during the extended cover period, the new policy must be backdated to 1 July.

However, these new requirements will not apply where a firm’s insurer has notified the firm and CLC by 31 March that it will not renew.

CLC director of strategy and external relations Stephen Ward said: ‘We believe that the package of reforms we have agreed with the LSB are fair to both our regulated community and insurers alike, and at the same time meet our primary responsibility to protect the public interest.

‘A robust and sustainable professional indemnity insurance scheme is a cornerstone of our regulatory approach, and we will continue to monitor its effectiveness during the renewal round, as we do every year.’

Ward said the CLC will also review policy on cyber-cover, as there is ‘significant support for mandatory cover but also concern about its cost and the wide variations in what is provided by different policies’.
Issue: 7984 / Categories: Legal News , Conveyancing , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll