header-logo header-logo

Plans to extend police powers are panned

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Proposals to relax fingerprinting restrictions and allow police to question suspects until the time of their trial—even after charges have been made—have been attacked by lawyers and civil rights campaigners.

The Home Office plans, laid out in a consultation paper reviewing the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 last week, also float the idea of allowing police to site short-term detention centres in shopping malls.

The government says existing rules, which require suspects to be taken to police stations, take too long and clog up space in police custody. The cells could hold suspects for up to four hours to enable fingerprinting, photographing and DNA sampling.

DNA samples and fingerprints could be taken from those suspected of petty crimes. Liberty policy director Gareth Crossman says: “Six years ago, DNA sampling was about combating serious crime. Today dropping litter is proposed as a lame excuse for an ever-growing national DNA database.”
The consultation looks at areas of police work ranging from how suspects are bailed to how stop-and-search operations are conducted.

Criminal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll