header-logo header-logo

Playing with fire?

06 October 2011 / Simon Goldstone
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

FSA v Alexander: playing the system, or manipulating the market, asks Simon Goldstone

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined Barnett Alexander, a self-employed trader, £700,000 in June for market abuse. Alexander’s scheme was to deal in shares so as to influence the price of derivative “contracts for difference” (CFD’s); he would make a profit on subsequent CFD trades on automated exchanges. The trades were on the open market, with willing participants on the basis of transparent prices.

A CFD is an agreement to exchange the difference in value of a share between the time when the contract is opened and the time when the contract is sold. A trader can agree to buy, then sell, a CFD in XCo if he thinks that the share value will go up; he can sell, then buy, if he thinks the market will fall. You can trade CFD’s without owning the underlying shares—think instead of CFD’s as shadowing the shares. The value of an XCo CFD is directly related to the price at which XCo shares are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll