header-logo header-logo

Playing with fire?

06 October 2011 / Simon Goldstone
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

FSA v Alexander: playing the system, or manipulating the market, asks Simon Goldstone

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined Barnett Alexander, a self-employed trader, £700,000 in June for market abuse. Alexander’s scheme was to deal in shares so as to influence the price of derivative “contracts for difference” (CFD’s); he would make a profit on subsequent CFD trades on automated exchanges. The trades were on the open market, with willing participants on the basis of transparent prices.

A CFD is an agreement to exchange the difference in value of a share between the time when the contract is opened and the time when the contract is sold. A trader can agree to buy, then sell, a CFD in XCo if he thinks that the share value will go up; he can sell, then buy, if he thinks the market will fall. You can trade CFD’s without owning the underlying shares—think instead of CFD’s as shadowing the shares. The value of an XCo CFD is directly related to the price at which XCo shares are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll