header-logo header-logo

06 October 2011 / Simon Goldstone
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Playing with fire?

FSA v Alexander: playing the system, or manipulating the market, asks Simon Goldstone

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined Barnett Alexander, a self-employed trader, £700,000 in June for market abuse. Alexander’s scheme was to deal in shares so as to influence the price of derivative “contracts for difference” (CFD’s); he would make a profit on subsequent CFD trades on automated exchanges. The trades were on the open market, with willing participants on the basis of transparent prices.

A CFD is an agreement to exchange the difference in value of a share between the time when the contract is opened and the time when the contract is sold. A trader can agree to buy, then sell, a CFD in XCo if he thinks that the share value will go up; he can sell, then buy, if he thinks the market will fall. You can trade CFD’s without owning the underlying shares—think instead of CFD’s as shadowing the shares. The value of an XCo CFD is directly related to the price at which XCo shares are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
A Court of Appeal ruling shows that a failed nuisance claim may still leave a neighbour liable in negligence where foreseeable harm could readily have been avoided
The government has stepped back from a proposed early-release exclusion limited to unlawful act manslaughter, opting instead to exclude all manslaughter sentences
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience
back-to-top-scroll