header-logo header-logo

05 August 2010 / Patricia Shine
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Features , EU , Insurance / reinsurance , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Playing by the rules

Patricia Shine reports on an own goal in an EU insurance dispute

The Brussels I Regulation (the regulation) on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters establishes a general scheme of jurisdictional rules to be applied uniformly across the EU. Jurisdiction is based primarily on the domicile of the defendant as set out in Art 2, but this basic rule may be varied by one of the supporting and amplifying provisions set out in other articles. Insurance matters, however, have their own jurisdiction rules, with the aim of ensuring stronger protection for the weaker party, as set out in Arts 8 to 14 in Chapter II, s 3, of the regulation. Article 12(1) states that in insurance matters, an insurer may bring proceedings only in the courts of the member state in which the defendant is domiciled, irrespective of whether he is the policyholder, the insured or a beneficiary. Article 13 allows the rules in this section to be departed from in the event of agreement between the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll