header-logo header-logo

05 August 2010 / Patricia Shine
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Features , EU , Insurance / reinsurance , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Playing by the rules

Patricia Shine reports on an own goal in an EU insurance dispute

The Brussels I Regulation (the regulation) on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters establishes a general scheme of jurisdictional rules to be applied uniformly across the EU. Jurisdiction is based primarily on the domicile of the defendant as set out in Art 2, but this basic rule may be varied by one of the supporting and amplifying provisions set out in other articles. Insurance matters, however, have their own jurisdiction rules, with the aim of ensuring stronger protection for the weaker party, as set out in Arts 8 to 14 in Chapter II, s 3, of the regulation. Article 12(1) states that in insurance matters, an insurer may bring proceedings only in the courts of the member state in which the defendant is domiciled, irrespective of whether he is the policyholder, the insured or a beneficiary. Article 13 allows the rules in this section to be departed from in the event of agreement between the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll