header-logo header-logo

11 September 2013
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Playlist spat court-bound

Ministry of Sound claims copyright over track listings

The Ministry of Sound record label is suing music streaming site Spotify for breach of copyright in what could be a landmark case.

The Ministry claims copyright over its track listings, which are compilations of tracks by different artists and alleges that Spotify has infringed this copyright by reproducing the Ministry track listings.

The Ministry, which launched legal proceedings in the High Court last week, asserts that the law protects “the expertise and creative effort involved” in curating titles such as Ibiza Annual 2013. It is seeking an injunction requiring Spotify to remove the playlists and permanently block playlists that copy its compilations, as well as damages and costs.

Vanessa Barnett, partner at Charles Russell, said: “To get copyright protection in a playlist there needs to be a great deal of intellectual creativity and clout—quite how you get that with a list of songs is debatable.”

John Wilks, partner at DLA Piper, said a key issue would be whether the Ministry can establish that it meets the threshold for originality of the works, which is whether it is the “author’s own intellectual creation”.

He said: “Businesses involved in creating compilations will watch this case with interest, as it has important ramifications for the feasibility of such businesses in the face of digital content sharing platforms like Spotify.”

 

Issue: 7575 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll