header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Please re-lease me

Malcolm Dowden on disputes of disclaimed leases & subtenants of part

A liquidator’s disclaimer of a lease ends the rights, interests and liabilities of the insolvent tenant in respect of the property, but statute preserves the rights and liabilities of other parties, including mortgagees and subtenants.

However, where subtenants remain in occupation, and particularly where they occupy only part of the premises covered by the disclaimed lease, the extent of their liabilities and obligations to the landlord is unclear.

The “phantom” lease

Insolvency Act 1986 s 178(4) provides that disclaimer: (i) determines, as from the date of disclaimer, the rights, interests and liabilities of the company in or in respect of the property disclaimed, but (ii)does not, except so far as is necessary for the purpose of releasing the company from any liability, affect the rights or liabilities of any other person.

Hindcastle v Barbara Attenborough ([1997] AC 70, [1996] 1 All ER 737) confirmed that under this deeming provision the rights and liabilities of guarantors, mortgagees and subtenants remain as though the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll