header-logo header-logo

11 November 2015
Issue: 7676 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

PM's EU curbs

Restrictions on EU migrants’ access to in-work benefits have been proposed as one of David Cameron’s bargaining chips in the UK’s EU membership renegotiation.

The prime minister has said he would like to stop EU migrants from claiming benefits for the first four years of their residence. However, legal experts have warned this could be discriminatory, and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker is reported to have indicated that he sees the proposal as “highly problematic”.

Cameron set out four objectives in his demands to Donald Tusk, president of the European council, this week. The others are: explicit recognition that the euro is not the EU’s only currency; a target for the reduction of red tape; and an exemption for the UK from the EU’s founding ambition of “ever-closer union” and greater powers for Westminster to block EU legislation.

Issue: 7676 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll