header-logo header-logo

08 April 2020 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Features , Public , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Police powers & COVID-19

18949
If the police are to maintain public support in these turbulent times they must ensure that their actions are consistent, necessary & proportionate, says Nicholas Dobson
  • The restrictions imposed by Government regulation to curtail coronavirus transmission are unprecedently stringent and are therefore designed to be temporary.
  • Police and other officials designated to enforce the restrictions need to do so sensibly and proportionately if they are to maintain public confidence.

It wasn’t quite Neville Chamberlain declaring war. But it was still a showstopper. Literally. For on the evening of 23 March 2020, Boris Johnson called the nation to arms against COVID-19 and ‘the devastating impact of this invisible killer’. He issued ‘a very simple instruction’ to the British people—‘you must stay at home’. For we must ‘stop the disease spreading between households’. Although the instructions were simple, they were stark and unprecedented. People would be allowed to leave their homes for only the following ‘very limited purposes’, namely:

  • shopping for basic necessities as infrequently as possible;
  • one form of exercise
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll