header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Porridge vote

In brief

A public consultation on a prisoner’s right to vote has been announced by the government following the European Court of Human Rights’ ruling in Hirst v United Kingdom in which a life sentence prisoner successfully challenged the UK’s current arrangements. Currently, all convicted offenders held in UK prisons are barred from voting in UK elections. The government wants to retain this policy but is required to review it under its European Convention on Human Rights.

obligations. The consultation will allow people to comment on the current total disenfranchisement of convicted detained prisoners. The consultation will close on 7 March 2007 when the government will choose the most appropriate option and publish a second consultation, exploring how any change might work.

Issue: 7254 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll