header-logo header-logo

Portals causing stress & delay

18 October 2023
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Online court services are adding to delays and undermining access to justice, research by the Law Society has found

In a report published this week, Online court services: delivering a more efficient digital justice system, the Law Society highlighted technical issues across the damages claims, public family law and probate online portals.

Three in five solicitors responding to a survey said the portals had caused delays in court proceedings and one third reported increased costs arising as a result had been passed on to clients. Delays were experienced by three-quarters of probate, two-thirds of family public law and 46% of damages claim portal users.

More than half the probate users surveyed said the online process is taking longer than the paper-based system.

One probate practitioner said: ‘We have gone from a system that cost £45 and took two weeks to a system that costs £273 and takes 16 weeks! How is this progress?’

Half the damages claims users said the delays were affecting their clients. Some 70% of the family public law portal users reported technical errors and frequent breakdowns, and the vast majority (80%) reported lack of timeliness and technical support.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the court reform programme had enjoyed many successes, such as a high uptake of digital probate applications and more than 70% of all courtrooms being able to allow parties to join remotely.

However, the delays were ‘having a real impact on clients, especially as these portals are often used at an already challenging and difficult time.

‘The increased delays and associated uncertainty these portals have created are causing additional stress.’

The Law Society made several recommendations, including ‘a user-led design and development process involving the public, legal professionals and the advice sector’; and software to improve communication between online court systems and solicitors’ case management systems.

Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll