header-logo header-logo

Portals causing stress & delay

18 October 2023
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Online court services are adding to delays and undermining access to justice, research by the Law Society has found

In a report published this week, Online court services: delivering a more efficient digital justice system, the Law Society highlighted technical issues across the damages claims, public family law and probate online portals.

Three in five solicitors responding to a survey said the portals had caused delays in court proceedings and one third reported increased costs arising as a result had been passed on to clients. Delays were experienced by three-quarters of probate, two-thirds of family public law and 46% of damages claim portal users.

More than half the probate users surveyed said the online process is taking longer than the paper-based system.

One probate practitioner said: ‘We have gone from a system that cost £45 and took two weeks to a system that costs £273 and takes 16 weeks! How is this progress?’

Half the damages claims users said the delays were affecting their clients. Some 70% of the family public law portal users reported technical errors and frequent breakdowns, and the vast majority (80%) reported lack of timeliness and technical support.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the court reform programme had enjoyed many successes, such as a high uptake of digital probate applications and more than 70% of all courtrooms being able to allow parties to join remotely.

However, the delays were ‘having a real impact on clients, especially as these portals are often used at an already challenging and difficult time.

‘The increased delays and associated uncertainty these portals have created are causing additional stress.’

The Law Society made several recommendations, including ‘a user-led design and development process involving the public, legal professionals and the advice sector’; and software to improve communication between online court systems and solicitors’ case management systems.

Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll