header-logo header-logo

09 February 2018 / Gavin Bennison
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Possession claims against trespassers (Pt I)

nlj_7780_bennison

In this two-part series, Gavin Bennison considers the practicalities of obtaining injunctive relief against trespassers in County Court possession proceedings. This week—injunctions

  • When and how practitioners bringing possession claims against trespassers in the County Court under CPR Pt 55 might going about seeking injunctive relief in addition to a possession order.

In Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Meier & Ors [2010] 1 All ER 855, the Supreme Court held unanimously, affirming a 2–1 decision of the Court of Appeal, that a court might combine an order for possession of land made against trespassers with a prohibitory injunction restraining continued trespass onto the same land. In the author’s experience, however, it is rare that an injunction restraining trespass is sought in addition to an order for possession in possession proceedings against trespassers brought in the county court under Part 55 of the Civil Pocedure Rules (CPR). A recent case, which concerned repeated and wide-ranging acts of trespass onto a large plot of scrubland, afforded the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll