header-logo header-logo

Possession claims against trespassers (Pt I)

09 February 2018 / Gavin Bennison
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7780_bennison

In this two-part series, Gavin Bennison considers the practicalities of obtaining injunctive relief against trespassers in County Court possession proceedings. This week—injunctions

  • When and how practitioners bringing possession claims against trespassers in the County Court under CPR Pt 55 might going about seeking injunctive relief in addition to a possession order.

In Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Meier & Ors [2010] 1 All ER 855, the Supreme Court held unanimously, affirming a 2–1 decision of the Court of Appeal, that a court might combine an order for possession of land made against trespassers with a prohibitory injunction restraining continued trespass onto the same land. In the author’s experience, however, it is rare that an injunction restraining trespass is sought in addition to an order for possession in possession proceedings against trespassers brought in the county court under Part 55 of the Civil Pocedure Rules (CPR). A recent case, which concerned repeated and wide-ranging acts of trespass onto a large plot of scrubland, afforded the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

Regional firm strengthens corporate team with partner hire

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Commercial property team expands with trio of appointments

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll