header-logo header-logo

10 September 2020 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Features , Public , Housing , Equality
printer mail-detail

Possession matters

27158
Nicholas Dobson reports on housing deception & the public sector equality duty

In brief

  • The extent to which the public sector equality duty in s 149 of the Equality Act 2010 might trump a housing possession claim where the tenant had obtained the tenancy through deception.
  • Even after paying due regard to the public sector equality duty and material disabilities, the landlord could lawfully have decided to continue with the possession claim and was highly likely to have done so.
  • The appeal was allowed but the claim remitted to the judge to determine whether it is reasonable to make the order for possession.

Sometimes life throws up some tough dilemmas. Homer’s Odysseus certainly had his share. For having dealt with the Sirens he then managed to sail by the two deadly monsters, Scylla and Charybdis. Scylla (apart from sound lethal talents) was pulchritudinously challenged. Sporting 12 misshapen feet, six necks of ‘prodigious length’, a frightful head at the end of each and three rows of teeth to crush any callers,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll