header-logo header-logo

03 May 2018
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Post-Brexit justice remains uncertain

The final deal Britain strikes with the EU should not be subject to the direct jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (CJEU), the Law Society has warned.

Instead, the Law Society has urged the government to create a bespoke, UK-based mechanism for individuals and organisations to resolve disputes relating to the deal. In its paper, ‘Brexit: Options for a future UK-EU Dispute Settlement Mechanism’, published this week, the Law Society suggests that the new mechanism be modelled on the CJEU or the European Free Trade Area (EFTA) Court preliminary ruling system.

‘At the moment disputes are handled by the CJEU and, as an EU member, we’ve had judges sitting in that court and UK lawyers representing clients,’ said Law Society president Joe Egan.

‘The jurisdiction will remain during any transition. However, once we leave we think the CJEU should be denied direct jurisdiction over the new agreement because the UK will no longer have full participation in the court.’

The UK currently has three ECJ judges and an advocate general.

Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll