header-logo header-logo

03 May 2018
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Post-Brexit justice remains uncertain

The final deal Britain strikes with the EU should not be subject to the direct jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (CJEU), the Law Society has warned.

Instead, the Law Society has urged the government to create a bespoke, UK-based mechanism for individuals and organisations to resolve disputes relating to the deal. In its paper, ‘Brexit: Options for a future UK-EU Dispute Settlement Mechanism’, published this week, the Law Society suggests that the new mechanism be modelled on the CJEU or the European Free Trade Area (EFTA) Court preliminary ruling system.

‘At the moment disputes are handled by the CJEU and, as an EU member, we’ve had judges sitting in that court and UK lawyers representing clients,’ said Law Society president Joe Egan.

‘The jurisdiction will remain during any transition. However, once we leave we think the CJEU should be denied direct jurisdiction over the new agreement because the UK will no longer have full participation in the court.’

The UK currently has three ECJ judges and an advocate general.

Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll