header-logo header-logo

Post-PACCAR litigation funding

06 November 2024
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have been asked for their views on third party funding for the next stage of the Civil Justice Council (CJC) review

The CJC working group, set up following the Supreme Court’s PACCAR decision in 2023, which found certain third-party funding agreements to be invalid, is co-chaired by Dr John Sorabji and Mr Justice Simon Picken. It published an interim report last week but has not yet made any recommendations.

The CJC is also conducting a review of the Solicitors Act 1974. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, said: ‘The CJC understands that there will be areas of overlap between the work of that group and the litigation funding group.’

The litigation funding consultation ends on 31 January 2025, and a full report will be published in summer 2025.
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll