header-logo header-logo

Post-PACCAR litigation funding

06 November 2024
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have been asked for their views on third party funding for the next stage of the Civil Justice Council (CJC) review

The CJC working group, set up following the Supreme Court’s PACCAR decision in 2023, which found certain third-party funding agreements to be invalid, is co-chaired by Dr John Sorabji and Mr Justice Simon Picken. It published an interim report last week but has not yet made any recommendations.

The CJC is also conducting a review of the Solicitors Act 1974. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, said: ‘The CJC understands that there will be areas of overlap between the work of that group and the litigation funding group.’

The litigation funding consultation ends on 31 January 2025, and a full report will be published in summer 2025.
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll