header-logo header-logo

06 November 2024
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Post-PACCAR litigation funding

Lawyers have been asked for their views on third party funding for the next stage of the Civil Justice Council (CJC) review

The CJC working group, set up following the Supreme Court’s PACCAR decision in 2023, which found certain third-party funding agreements to be invalid, is co-chaired by Dr John Sorabji and Mr Justice Simon Picken. It published an interim report last week but has not yet made any recommendations.

The CJC is also conducting a review of the Solicitors Act 1974. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, said: ‘The CJC understands that there will be areas of overlap between the work of that group and the litigation funding group.’

The litigation funding consultation ends on 31 January 2025, and a full report will be published in summer 2025.
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll