header-logo header-logo

14 February 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Postal Services Act 2011 (Disclosure of Information) Order 2012 (SI 2012/Draft)

Prescribes bodies or other persons, enactments and circumstances and purposes which are exempt from the general prohibition...

Commencement date

To be appointed


Enabling Power

Postal Services Act 2011, s 56(2), (3), (4)


Summary

Prescribes bodies or other persons, enactments and circumstances and purposes which are exempt from the general prohibition in the Postal Services Act 2011 (the 2011 Act) on disclosure of information obtained by virtue of the exercise of regulatory functions under Part 3 of that Act. Ofcom (the new postal services regulator) has statutory powers under section 55 of the 2011 Act to require information to be provided. The effect of this Order is to supplement the existing exemptions, set out in section 56, to that general prohibition. Taken together with the exemptions to the general prohibition on disclosure provided in section 56(2), the provisions of this Order have the effect of creating a disclosure regime comparable to the (now repealed) permitted disclosure regime in Schedule

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll