header-logo header-logo

23 May 2014 / Richard Freeth
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Potential for conflict

Special educational needs provision is facing its most significant change for 30 years, says Richard Freeth

The Children & Families Act 2014 establishes a new framework in England to support children and young people with special educational needs (SEN) or disabilities which is due to come into effect in September 2014. It is envisaged that the framework will establish a holistic support network based on a multi-agency approach with clear requirements for co-operation, joint commissioning and integrated provision which would improve outcomes for children and young people from birth to 25 with SEN. These statutory duties to co-operate are set out in the Act and reinforced by regulations and the new SEN Code of Practice.

 

Of course, co-operation between agencies to support vulnerable groups is nothing new. Within the current framework the local authority has a central and non-delegable duty to ensure provision to meet SEN is secure. However with other agencies and schools having a supporting role there is a real danger of conflict especially where the child’s needs are complex and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll