header-logo header-logo

23 May 2014 / Richard Freeth
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Potential for conflict

Special educational needs provision is facing its most significant change for 30 years, says Richard Freeth

The Children & Families Act 2014 establishes a new framework in England to support children and young people with special educational needs (SEN) or disabilities which is due to come into effect in September 2014. It is envisaged that the framework will establish a holistic support network based on a multi-agency approach with clear requirements for co-operation, joint commissioning and integrated provision which would improve outcomes for children and young people from birth to 25 with SEN. These statutory duties to co-operate are set out in the Act and reinforced by regulations and the new SEN Code of Practice.

 

Of course, co-operation between agencies to support vulnerable groups is nothing new. Within the current framework the local authority has a central and non-delegable duty to ensure provision to meet SEN is secure. However with other agencies and schools having a supporting role there is a real danger of conflict especially where the child’s needs are complex and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll