header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Nicola Brant
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Property , Leasehold
printer mail-detail

Potential issues for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022

146635
Nicola Brant finds troublesome defects in the Act which was meant to improve building safety after Grenfell
  • Highlights uncertainties under the Building Safety Act 2022, which require urgent clarification.

In the words of the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC), ‘[t]his Act makes ground-breaking reforms to give residents and homeowners more rights, powers, and protections—so homes across the country are safer. It delivers far-reaching protections for qualifying leaseholders from the costs associated with remediating historical building safety defects, and an ambitious toolkit of measures that will allow those responsible for building safety defects to be held to account’. This admirable aim fulfilled a promise made after the tragic fire at Grenfell Tower in 2017, which cost the lives of 72 people.

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA 2022) came into effect last summer, and has already required some changes to deal with issues for the construction sector, but only now are some of the issues for leaseholders coming to light. This article looks

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll