header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013 / Peter Stevens
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

Peter Stevens outlines the proposals to enhance collective redress mechanisms

The Consumer Rights Bill is a major piece of legislation, consolidating and updating swathes of consumer protection legislation in the UK. When the Bill was published on 12 June 2013, most of it came as little surprise, as it has already been extensively trailed in consultation papers and draft clauses. However, tucked away at the end, s 82 reads quite simply, “Schedule 7 (private actions in competition law) has effect”.

This is nothing to do with the Consumer Rights Directive, which the rest of the Bill is designed to implement, but has been on a separate agenda for some time. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published recommendations in this area in November 2007 and the European Commission’s Green Paper in November 2008 canvassed opinions on a number of options for harmonising the collective redress mechanisms across the EU. The UK government launched its own consultation paper in April 2012 and, in January 2013, announced its intention to legislate. Meanwhile, the European Commission’s draft directive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll