header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013 / Peter Stevens
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

Peter Stevens outlines the proposals to enhance collective redress mechanisms

The Consumer Rights Bill is a major piece of legislation, consolidating and updating swathes of consumer protection legislation in the UK. When the Bill was published on 12 June 2013, most of it came as little surprise, as it has already been extensively trailed in consultation papers and draft clauses. However, tucked away at the end, s 82 reads quite simply, “Schedule 7 (private actions in competition law) has effect”.

This is nothing to do with the Consumer Rights Directive, which the rest of the Bill is designed to implement, but has been on a separate agenda for some time. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published recommendations in this area in November 2007 and the European Commission’s Green Paper in November 2008 canvassed opinions on a number of options for harmonising the collective redress mechanisms across the EU. The UK government launched its own consultation paper in April 2012 and, in January 2013, announced its intention to legislate. Meanwhile, the European Commission’s draft directive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll