header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013 / Peter Stevens
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

Peter Stevens outlines the proposals to enhance collective redress mechanisms

The Consumer Rights Bill is a major piece of legislation, consolidating and updating swathes of consumer protection legislation in the UK. When the Bill was published on 12 June 2013, most of it came as little surprise, as it has already been extensively trailed in consultation papers and draft clauses. However, tucked away at the end, s 82 reads quite simply, “Schedule 7 (private actions in competition law) has effect”.

This is nothing to do with the Consumer Rights Directive, which the rest of the Bill is designed to implement, but has been on a separate agenda for some time. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published recommendations in this area in November 2007 and the European Commission’s Green Paper in November 2008 canvassed opinions on a number of options for harmonising the collective redress mechanisms across the EU. The UK government launched its own consultation paper in April 2012 and, in January 2013, announced its intention to legislate. Meanwhile, the European Commission’s draft directive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll