header-logo header-logo

27 July 2021
Issue: 7943 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Court of Protection , Profession
printer mail-detail

Powers of attorney overhaul

Ministers are consulting on plans to overhaul the lasting power of attorney (LPA) process, shifting to a mainly digital service and introducing more safeguards against fraud and abuse

LPAs were introduced in 2007 under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and the numbers have risen in recent years to more than five million. A 12-week consultation launched last week, insert name, contains plans to speed up and simplify the process of nominating someone to have LPAs by making the service digital. To counteract fraud, the Office of the Public Guardian’s (OPG) powers would be expanded to allow it to check identities and stop or delay any registrations that flag up concerns.

The consultation will cover witnessing and remote witnessing and the need for safeguards, expansion of the OPG’s powers, treatment of objections to LPAs, and how solicitors can access the service. Any changes will require amendments to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Respond to the consutation, at bit.ly/3BxCPE7 by 13 October.

Tim Snaith, partner at Winckworth Sherwood, said: ‘Each form is over 20 pages long, requires in excess of six signatures (sometimes this can reach in excess of ten), and must be signed in a strict order.

‘Lasting Powers of Attorney must also be registered with the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) before they become effective. Even if no mistakes have been made on the forms, there is a minimum waiting period of four weeks before registration to allow for any objections, and due to delays at the OPG, it commonly takes around 12 weeks before the documents can be used.’

However, Snaith warned that any modernisation reforms must be carefully balanced against the risk of abuse.

Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX, welcomed the government plans and called on ministers also to correct ‘a longstanding anomaly’ where only solicitors and notaries public (and not CILEX Lawyers) can certify LPAs.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll