header-logo header-logo

27 July 2021
Issue: 7943 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Court of Protection , Profession
printer mail-detail

Powers of attorney overhaul

Ministers are consulting on plans to overhaul the lasting power of attorney (LPA) process, shifting to a mainly digital service and introducing more safeguards against fraud and abuse

LPAs were introduced in 2007 under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and the numbers have risen in recent years to more than five million. A 12-week consultation launched last week, insert name, contains plans to speed up and simplify the process of nominating someone to have LPAs by making the service digital. To counteract fraud, the Office of the Public Guardian’s (OPG) powers would be expanded to allow it to check identities and stop or delay any registrations that flag up concerns.

The consultation will cover witnessing and remote witnessing and the need for safeguards, expansion of the OPG’s powers, treatment of objections to LPAs, and how solicitors can access the service. Any changes will require amendments to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Respond to the consutation, at bit.ly/3BxCPE7 by 13 October.

Tim Snaith, partner at Winckworth Sherwood, said: ‘Each form is over 20 pages long, requires in excess of six signatures (sometimes this can reach in excess of ten), and must be signed in a strict order.

‘Lasting Powers of Attorney must also be registered with the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) before they become effective. Even if no mistakes have been made on the forms, there is a minimum waiting period of four weeks before registration to allow for any objections, and due to delays at the OPG, it commonly takes around 12 weeks before the documents can be used.’

However, Snaith warned that any modernisation reforms must be carefully balanced against the risk of abuse.

Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX, welcomed the government plans and called on ministers also to correct ‘a longstanding anomaly’ where only solicitors and notaries public (and not CILEX Lawyers) can certify LPAs.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll