header-logo header-logo

Practical advice & support from the Black Solicitors Network

22 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail
The Black Solicitors Network (BSN) has challenged law firms and organisations to ‘walk the talk’ on redressing racial inequality

In a letter sent out to senior managers this week, the BSN notes how the tragedy of George Floyd’s murder in the US has led to a surge of ‘courageous conversations’ in workplaces around the world. It calls on firms to build accountability into their diversity initiatives and sets out five points of action.

First, metrics and accountability. Black lawyers make up three per cent of the profession. The BSN advocates collecting data and monitoring ‘racial diversity through the employee life-cycle from recruitment to promotion, attrition (for example, by holding exit interviews) and remuneration, including ethnicity pay gap reporting’. It urges firms to implement targets on recruitment and progression, and calls on in-house legal teams to exercise their purchase power to demand their panels of external law firms invest in black lawyers.

Second, according to the BSN, attrition levels are higher for black lawyers than any other group, particularly in the step from trainee to associate. It suggests that offering more high-profile assignments, client opportunities, secondments and mentoring could help tackle this issue. Third, black lawyers are under-represented when it comes to senior promotions―Solicitors Regulation Authority figures from 2017 showed that only one per cent of partners at large law firms are black.

Fourth, in terms of culture and leadership, the BSN urges law firms and organisations to ‘call out bias and micro-aggressions when they arise and uphold a zero-tolerance policy for discriminatory behaviour, such as racist bullying and harassment (whether covert or overt). Introduce mandatory anti-bias, anti-racism and inclusion training for all staff’ and hold leaders to account for progress on racial diversity’.

Fifth, firms and organisations can also make a social impact by offering career insight events and work experience to local state schools, providing bursaries and scholarships for black candidates from underprivileged backgrounds, and through pro bono work.

For more information about the work of BSN, visit www.blacksolicitorsnetwork.co.uk or email executive@blacksolicitorsnetwork.org.

Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll