header-logo header-logo

A practical alphabet

08 April 2016 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
istock_000051280932_web

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to (multi-track) disclosure

Access to documents

Where and in what form are the relevant documents stored and located? How easy will it be to access them?

Back up policies

What is the company policy on back-ups for disaster recovery purposes? Daily, weekly, monthly? How and where are the back-ups stored?

Case management conference

You must have all your disclosure ducks in a row well in advance of the CMC, to enable the court to make effective and realistic directions.

Disclosure statement

Who should sign this important statement? It should be the party wherever possible, or potentially the legal representative where disclosure has become a massive or particularly complicated business.

Electronic disclosure

Does your case lend itself to the electronic disclosure regime? A separate A to Z may be required for that one!

Fixed fee

If you are outsourcing the electronic aspects of disclosure, consider asking your provider for a fixed fee.

Get talking

Parties should discuss and seek to agree a proposal for disclosure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll