header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A practical alphabet

istock_000051280932_web

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to (multi-track) disclosure

Access to documents

Where and in what form are the relevant documents stored and located? How easy will it be to access them?

Back up policies

What is the company policy on back-ups for disaster recovery purposes? Daily, weekly, monthly? How and where are the back-ups stored?

Case management conference

You must have all your disclosure ducks in a row well in advance of the CMC, to enable the court to make effective and realistic directions.

Disclosure statement

Who should sign this important statement? It should be the party wherever possible, or potentially the legal representative where disclosure has become a massive or particularly complicated business.

Electronic disclosure

Does your case lend itself to the electronic disclosure regime? A separate A to Z may be required for that one!

Fixed fee

If you are outsourcing the electronic aspects of disclosure, consider asking your provider for a fixed fee.

Get talking

Parties should discuss and seek to agree a proposal for disclosure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll