header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A practical alphabet

istock_000051280932_web

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to (multi-track) disclosure

Access to documents

Where and in what form are the relevant documents stored and located? How easy will it be to access them?

Back up policies

What is the company policy on back-ups for disaster recovery purposes? Daily, weekly, monthly? How and where are the back-ups stored?

Case management conference

You must have all your disclosure ducks in a row well in advance of the CMC, to enable the court to make effective and realistic directions.

Disclosure statement

Who should sign this important statement? It should be the party wherever possible, or potentially the legal representative where disclosure has become a massive or particularly complicated business.

Electronic disclosure

Does your case lend itself to the electronic disclosure regime? A separate A to Z may be required for that one!

Fixed fee

If you are outsourcing the electronic aspects of disclosure, consider asking your provider for a fixed fee.

Get talking

Parties should discuss and seek to agree a proposal for disclosure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll