header-logo header-logo

06 March 2015
Issue: 7643 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

Rawding v Seaga UK Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 113, [2015] All ER (D) 233 (Feb)

In County Court proceedings, the defendant was unsuccessful. He appealed seeking to admit fresh evidence on appeal. He had previously tried to adduce that evidence prior to judgment being given in the county court but the judge had refused the application. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division allowed the application on the basis that the case was not one of those typical cases in which the evidence had come to light after the proceedings had been concluded indicating that the trial court had been deliberately misled.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
Calls to raise the age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 14 have been renewed, with the Bar Council arguing the current threshold criminalises children too early and risks pushing them towards lifelong offending
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
back-to-top-scroll