header-logo header-logo

24 July 2015
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

R (on the application of Sarkandi and others) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2015] EWCA Civ 687, [2015] All ER (D) 138 (Jul)

The claimants appealed against a declaration, under s 6 of the Justice and Security Act 2013, that their judicial review proceedings were proceedings in which a closed material application might be made to the court. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the appeal, held that the judge had correctly held that the two statutory conditions in s 6(4) and (5) of the Act had been met. In particular, the closed material would be disclosable subject to a public interest immunity claim and an application for public interest immunity would not represent a satisfactory alternative.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson adds top property litigation Partner in record real estate expansion

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher expands Personal Injury team with impressive partner from Stewarts

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Global firm strengthens insurance practice with appointment of partner

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll