header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Practice and procedure

Kaye v Lawrence [2010] EWHC 2678 (TCC), [2010] All ER (D) 264 (Oct)

As an appeal under s 10(17) of the Party Walls Act 1996 was a creature of statute, the High Court could not ignore the fact that the county court was the appropriate court. However jurisdiction could be found under s 5(3) of the County Courts Act 1984, which provided that “every judge of the High Court... shall by virtue of his office be capable of sitting as a judge for any county court district in England and Wales”.

Aktas v Adepta, Dixie v British Polythene Industries plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1170, [2010] All ER (D) 223 (Oct)

There was nothing in the established law to the effect that failure to serve a claim form in time for the purposes of CPR 7.6 was an abuse of process, or tantamount to one. For a matter to be an abuse of process, something more than a single negligent oversight in timely service was required. The CPR was strict and would be strictly applied. Negligence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll